Differences between revisions 3 and 15 (spanning 12 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2012-02-27 22:28:56
Size: 1205
Editor: roed
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2012-03-16 14:12:14
Size: 1845
Editor: was
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
=== Logistics ===

We'll meet at 11am on Saturday March 17 at [[http://www.cafeallegromusic.com/|Cafe Allegro]], and will plan the logistics for the rest of the week. Contact David if you have questions.

=== Objectives ===
Line 6: Line 12:
 * Review some of the 275 tickets currently needing review.
 * Improve Sage's review and testing infrastructure. This may include setting up a system that allows line by line comments (like Google's internal Perforce system, or the open source versions Rietveld or Review Board), requiring authors of tickets to suggest a reviewer and setting up systems to provide defaults, fixing patchbot and finishing the new doctesting code (#12415)

 * Review some of the 278 tickets currently needing review.
 * Come up with a way to ensure that critical tickets [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11358|like this]] don't get lost beneath the radar.
 * Improve Sage's review and testing infrastructure.
   * Set up a system that allows line by line comments (like Google's internal Mondrian system, or the open source versions Rietveld or Review Board)
   * Implement a system requiring authors of tickets to suggest a reviewer (while providing defaults)
   * Fixing patchbot
   * Finish the new doctesting code: [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12415|#12415]]
Line 22: Line 34:
 * Jen Balakrishnan (Harvard University)
 * Rob Beezer (University of Puget Sound)
Line 23: Line 37:
 * Jen Balakrishnan (Harvard University)
 * Karl-Dieter Crisman (Gordon College)
 * Tom Boothby (Simon Fraser University)
 * Robert Bradshaw (Google)
Line 26: Line 40:
 * R. Andrew Ohana (University of Washington)
 * John Palmieri (University of Washington)
Line 27: Line 43:
 * William Stein (University of Washington)  * William Stein (University of Washington) -- but will be gone March 20 to ICERM.

Sage Review Days 2: Seattle, WA

March 17-22, University of Washington

Logistics

We'll meet at 11am on Saturday March 17 at Cafe Allegro, and will plan the logistics for the rest of the week. Contact David if you have questions.

Objectives

The purpose of this workshop will be twofold.

  • Review some of the 278 tickets currently needing review.
  • Come up with a way to ensure that critical tickets like this don't get lost beneath the radar.

  • Improve Sage's review and testing infrastructure.
    • Set up a system that allows line by line comments (like Google's internal Mondrian system, or the open source versions Rietveld or Review Board)
    • Implement a system requiring authors of tickets to suggest a reviewer (while providing defaults)
    • Fixing patchbot
    • Finish the new doctesting code: #12415

Funding

Funding is still available: e-mail David Roe for more details.

Participants

The conference is organized by

The following people are likely to participate

  • Jen Balakrishnan (Harvard University)
  • Rob Beezer (University of Puget Sound)
  • Jon Bober (University of Washington)
  • Tom Boothby (Simon Fraser University)
  • Robert Bradshaw (Google)
  • Keshav Kini (Nanyang Technological University)
  • R. Andrew Ohana (University of Washington)
  • John Palmieri (University of Washington)
  • David Roe (University of Calgary)
  • William Stein (University of Washington) -- but will be gone March 20 to ICERM.

Lodging

Participants will stay at the Collegiana Inn -- 4311 - 12th Ave. NE Seattle, WA.

review2 (last edited 2012-03-23 23:17:31 by roed)